While Covid-19 has spurred debate about the need to elevate public health as a security concern, the securitisation of health presents both opportunities and trade-offs that need to be considered if we are to reallocate military spending to prepare for the next pandemic. The devastating toll of the Coronavirus pandemic has ignited a debate about the intersection of public health and national security. Once recognised as global leaders in pandemic preparedness, the United States and the United Kingdom have struggled to integrate policy responses to Covid-19 into existing security frameworks and to allocate resources accordingly. Indeed, public health spending in both countries pales in comparison to spending on counter-terrorism, even though more American lives have been lost to the pandemic than in all US wars since World War II and the number of Covid-19 deaths in the UK far exceed those attributed to terrorism in the last 50 years. Consequently, some academics and policymakers have questioned whether the prevailing notion of national security—a state’s capacity to defend its territory and …
Source link

The Health-Security Nexus: Reassessing Priorities after Covid-19
More from PoliticsMore posts in Politics »
- UK Shut Down Overseas Care Worker Visa Programme, Union Kicks
- Nigeria Senate passes two tax reform bills
- ‘Concretution’: Why Senate says Nigerians should ‘perish the thought’ of a new constitution
- The New ‘Worldmakers’: How the 20th Century Black Anticolonial Dialogue Reveals the Strategic Importance of the Milk Tea Alliance
- Comparing the 1860 and 2020 Elections: Is the USA Heading for Another Civil War?


Be First to Comment